Showing posts with label 2009. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2009. Show all posts

Friday, May 11, 2012

Book Beginnings on Friday

Book Beginnings on Friday is a meme hosted by Gilion from Rose City Reader. Instructions are pretty clear: just share the opening sentence of your current read, making sure that you include the title and author so others know what you're reading.

 This week's entry - Jasper Fforde's Shades of Grey






It began with my father not wanting to see the Last Rabbit and ended up with my being eaten by a carnivorous plant.

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Book Review: Andre Agassi, Open

Publisher/Year: Knopf, 2009

Open: An Autobiography (Vintage)
Tennis is a sport I know almost nothing about. Over the years I have come to know some of the names in the sport in passing--McEnroe, Navratilova, King, Graf, Sampras--if not the sport itself. What I associate most with tennis is the ping of the ball off the racket and the encompassing silence of the games beyond that. As an avid player of badminton in my youth, I can get behind the awesomeness of hitting that perfect folly over the net punctuated by that glorious sound. I don't understand the rules of the game, though it seems simple enough to play for fun. Given my somewhat apathetic attitude towards tennis, it is curious that I should pick up Andre Agassi's autobiography Open during my latest library trip.

I recall Agassi in terms of the popular culture referencing that we likely all have at some point. The hair, oh that hair and then none. The women--Streisand, Shields, finally Graf. The rock star attitude. These are all pieces within a much larger puzzle, I thought as I picked up the book. I would come to learn that while Agassi is indeed a larger puzzle these few pieces are rather quite large and take up consider space in his story.

When I finished this book, it was obvious to me that Agassi did not have to write it. Okay, lots (most) people don't have to write their autobiographies. But with Agassi, I can’t help but wonder what he thought could be gained from revealing a year-long crystal meth dalliance? To me, it is the setup to explain that he lied about the usage when confronted by a failed drug test (the book is title 'Open' afterall). He claimed "I drank a friend's spiked soda!” and the ATP bought the explanation. For this reader, this story resonated more about the wisdom, or rather failed wisdom, of a professional organization that allows a player to write a mere letter to defend their actions. It opens the door to ultimately letting the organization actively off the hook for conducting a proper investigation by letting an athlete let himself or herself off the hook.

But enough about this. I could go on for volumes about integrity or lack thereof in sports.

What Agassi gained in telling his story was an opportunity to negate or debunk some of the myths about him and possibly to also propagate others. It is sweet to know that Stephanie (Steffi) Graf was a significant feature is his personal life long before they became romantically involved. It comes through loud and clear that in her Agassi has found his other half. And the relationship between him and trainer-mentor-guru Gil Reyes is heartening to read about. Both threads of the story are not surprising though; it would be a different type of cheating on Agassi’s part to not have such archetypes factor into the story. Unfortunately for him, Hollywood as stripped out some of the sincerity of such archetypal relationships through melodramatic retellings in lesser fare. This makes the more emotional components of the story ring a bit hollow despite the obvious sincerity.

Two themes were clear to me throughout Agassi's detailed tellings of his professional and personal struggles. One, his insecurity. It would be easy to lay blame for this at the feet of his borderline abusive father but Agassi does not do this and nor can I. He simply seemed like a kid in an adult body until his 30s, much like many of our generation where self-confidence is often mistaken for self-esteem in our pursuit to be somebody. Sure, Agassi had lots of success and lots of defeat yet he spends considerable time retelling his many steps to the precipice of wanting to figure out why either would happen and then his rushing away from the edge. He seems afraid to know what was really lurking underneath the rebellions that lead to a pink mohawk or denim shorts or his first marriage. If I had to venture a guess, Agassi having to listen to his brother Philly repetitively being told by their father that he was a born loser had more impact on him than Philly.

Second, his sensitivity. This comes through crystal clear in the discussion around his first marriage. He and Shields connected based on a similar background but obviously there was not enough similarity to make it last. I had always thought Shields to be quite cold, and the image rendered here reinforces my thoughts. For example, when she questions why he got involved in the medical troubles of an acquaintance, it almost feels like a verbal slap in the face. And not just to him.

A clear outlet for this sensitivity was the establishment of his charter school for at-risk children in Las Vegas. Besides his family, this school is his haven and heaven. For a kid who brashly dropped out of school at 14 to open such an institution demonstrates a heightened acceptance that he was capable of more than tennis. The pedigree he brings to the school—eight grand slams, one Olympic gold medal, 60 titles, 1,000 matches—provides for a stability and a location of excellence that he himself craved throughout his career.

I must admit though to being bored when reading the passages dedicated to recounting matches. Technically these are the most action packed in any sports biography I've come across to date yet they read dry as clay when put to paper. I suspect you need to be a tennis fan, or have more than a cursory interest in the sport to truly get the grit within the passages. The only match of his that I recall fully watching was from the 2006 US Open against Marcos Baghdatis. I didn't really know what I was watching but it felt like history in the making (which it was) and I couldn't turn away.

His recounting of the physical and emotional pain endured then underscores my long respect for his passion for the sport. He often recounts in the book that he hates tennis but one does not risk permanent injury time and time again without some desire or passion fueling the fire within. And it underscores his respect for the sport and his fellow players. They do not always come across favorably but they are rendered fairly within his perspective. One does not get the feeling that Agassi despised any of them though, I’m sure there were times when he felt he did.

Overall, Open feels like Agassi on a quest. To where or to what I ends, I am unsure. There is plenty of information and details from which to drawn many different conclusions but the only one that matters is his own. As with all autobiographies, the literary goal is to demonstrate that a person has come "full circle" in some fashion. Same is true for Agassi. And having achieved so much personal and professional success by the age of 36, including this book, seems pretty full circle to me. May he keep questing and being 'open'.

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Table of Contents: While I'm Falling

While I'm FallingAuthor: Laura Moriarty
Publisher/Year: Hyperion, 2009
Synopsis: Ever since her parents announced that they're getting divorced, Veronica has been falling. Hard. A junior in college, she's fallen in love. She's fallen behind in her difficult coursework. She hates her job at the dorm, and she longs for the home that no longer exists. When an attempt to escape the pressure, combined with bad luck, lands her in a terrifying situation, a shaken Veronica calls her mother for help - only to find her former foundation too preoccupied to offer any assistance at all. But Veronica only gets to feel hurt for so long. Her mother shows up at the dorm with a surprising request - and with the elderly family dog in tow. Veronica soon finds herself with a new set of problems, and new questions about love and independence.

What Others Have To Say
Jodi Picoult, Author
"[It] deftly captures the moment a child realizes that growing up means being responsible for your parents' mistakes--and preventing yourself from making the same ones."

Dallas Morning News
"The conflicts, although they have broader social implications, are on a small scale. It’s Moriarty’s eye for detail and smart observations that elevate the novel above the level of mere domestic drama."

Chicklit Reviews
"...despite being slow, with barely any action, the story itself is very well written..."

Saturday, July 31, 2010

Table of Contents: Commencement

Commencement (Vintage Contemporaries)Author: J Courtney Sullivan
Publisher/Year: Knopf, 2009
Synopsis: Assigned to the same dorm their first year at Smith College, Celia, Bree, Sally, and April couldn’t have less in common. Celia, a lapsed Catholic, arrives with her grandmother’s rosary beads in hand and a bottle of vodka in her suitcase; beautiful Bree pines for the fiancé she left behind in Savannah; Sally, pristinely dressed in Lilly Pulitzer, is reeling from the loss of her mother; and April, a radical, redheaded feminist wearing a “Riot: Don’t Diet” T-shirt, wants a room transfer immediately.

Together they experience the ecstatic highs and painful lows of early adulthood: Celia’s trust in men is demolished in one terrible evening, Bree falls in love with someone she could never bring home to her traditional family, Sally seeks solace in her English professor, and April realizes that, for the first time in her life, she has friends she can actually confide in.

When they reunite for Sally’s wedding four years after graduation, their friendships have changed, but they remain fiercely devoted to one another. Schooled in the ideals of feminism, they have to figure out how it applies to their real lives in matters of love, work, family, and sex. For Celia, Bree, and Sally, this means grappling with one-night stands, maiden names, and parental disapproval—along with occasional loneliness and heartbreak. But for April, whose activism has become her life’s work, it means something far more dangerous.

What Others Have To Say

The New York Times
"[the] undertow of denial and avoidance is unfortunate in a novel with so much verve, making it feel overly tame, as if Sullivan wants to soothe and reassure her characters rather than letting them face the truths"

Entertainment Weekly
"...the author manages to find that sweet spot between Serious Literature and chick lit."

Extras
Author Interview

Monday, July 26, 2010

Line By Line: Jonathan Tropper, This Is Where I Leave You

This Is Where I Leave You: A Novel"And even if you didn't fall in love in the eighties, in your mind it will feel like the eighties, all innocent and airbrushed, with bright colors and shoulder pads and Pat Benetar or the Cure on the soundtrack."

"Phillip is the Paul McCartney of our family: better-looking than the rest of us, always facing a different direction in pictures, and occasionally rumored to be dead."

"We all start out so damn sure, thinking we've got the world on a string. If we ever stopped to think about the infinite number of ways we could be undone, we'd never leave our bedrooms."

"You never know when it will be the last time you'll see your father, or kiss your wife, or play with your little brother, but there's always a last time. If you could remember every last time, you'd never stop grieving."

When we reach the end of the page, and the last "amen" has been said, I'm sorry that' it's over. I could stay up here a while longer. And as we step down to make our way back to the pews, a quick survey of the sadness in my family's wet eyes tells me that I'm not the only one who feels that way. I don't feel any closer to my father than I did before, but for a moment there I was comforted, and that's more than I expected."

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Table of Contents: Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie

The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie: A Flavia de Luce MysteryAuthor: Alan Bradley
Publisher/Year: Delacorte Press, 2009
Synopsis: The summer of 1950 hasn’t offered up anything out of the ordinary for eleven-year-old Flavia de Luce: bicycle explorations around the village, keeping tabs on her neighbours, relentless battles with her older sisters, Ophelia and Daphne, and brewing up poisonous concoctions while plotting revenge in their home’s abandoned Victorian chemistry lab, which Flavia has claimed for her own.

But then a series of mysterious events gets Flavia’s attention: A dead bird is found on the doormat, a postage stamp bizarrely pinned to its beak. A mysterious late-night visitor argues with her aloof father, Colonel de Luce, behind closed doors. And in the early morning Flavia finds a red-headed stranger lying in the cucumber patch and watches him take his dying breath. For Flavia, the summer begins in earnest when murder comes to Buckshaw: “I wish I could say I was afraid, but I wasn’t. Quite the contrary. This was by far the most interesting thing that had ever happened to me in my entire life.”

What Others Have To Say

The Quill and Quire
"Bradley succeeds in making Flavia’s passion for chemistry believable, but the first part of the book creaks a bit, and the cliff-hangers at the end of each chapter are overdone."

Entertainment Weekly
"...disappointment creeps in only when you sense the plot tilting toward its final scenes."

"A wickedly clever story, a dead true and original voice, and an English country house in the summer: Alexander McCall Smith meets Sir Arthur Conan Doyle."
— Laurie R. King, New York Times bestselling author of The Game

Extras
Reading Guide

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Book Review: Andrew Davidson, The Gargoyle

Publisher/Year: Random House, 2009
Book Club: The Next Best Book Club 2010

Review
Andrew Davidson’s debut novel The Gargoyle has all the aspirations of bestseller dynamite, yet is clouded by the reality of reader contraction. Authorship pretensions bleed through on every page, through the clunky narration that at best limps along to a highly unsatisfactory and weary end. Davidson is, if nothing else, imaginative in his narrative formulations; however, the execution of these formulations runs the gamut from highly emotive to cringe-inducing.

The novel begins with high and seductive intentions, plunging its unnamed hero into a fiery self-apocalyptic adventure. A pornographer and cocaine addict, the hero runs off the road one night after witnessing a shower of arrows heading for him. He survives but suffers from horrific burns to the majority of the body, thanks to the explosive combination of the car catching fire and him having an open bottle of liquor in his lap.

While recovering in the burn unit, the hero learns that he has lost his good looks and his penis, and with that pretty much any will to live on. But, and it takes him awhile to accept this, he has also gained something in return - a mysterious female companion named Marianne Engel who claims to be his lover from the 14th century. Marianne is a sculptor well-known for her gargoyles that are high in demand by the wealthy. She is also a patient at the hospital, though a resident of the psychiatric unit and not the burn unit. Her assigned unit offers an explanation of sorts to the hero for the cryptic and history-steeped narrative formulations she hurls at the hero as fact.

The two become close, eventually resulting in co-habitation following the hero’s release from the hospital. Their slow-creeping closeness is not the resulting fantasy of a delusional mind paired with a psychically crippled one, as would be easy to conceive based on how the overarching story is initially positioned. Davidson leads the reader down the path in another direction, one that wishes to present a picture of calm sanity and battered redemption rooted in the ever-elusive tangible forces of love.

Through the months marking the hero’s recovery, Marianne reconstructs their love affair in installments that take on almost mythical proportions. She tells the hero of their first meeting, her a nun at a monastery at Engelthal and he a mercenary brought there for treatment after being hit by a flaming arrow. She nursed him back to health, renounced her vows, and fled with him to continue their apparently undying love affair. Her devotion to his recovery in the present mimics that expressed upon their initial engagement. Now, as then, it is Marianne who inspires the hero to live, to move beyond his blistering physical reality and to move towards the continuity of re-birth. To Marianne, “gargoyles ache to be born” and no such greater gargoyle has such a compulsive ache than the unnamed hero.

The release of their story is excruciatingly slow, a pace even noted by the hero, as Marianne weaves tales of inextinguishable love from around the world into their own. Viking Iceland, 14th century Italy, medieval Japan, and Victorian England all take resident in drawn out tragic tales that hinge on the four elements of air, water, fire, and earth to wring every ounce of romanticism for the hero’s edification. There is even a tour through Dante’s hell, a hallucinated travel positioned as a coda to previous narratives for the hero as he endures morphine withdrawal. All of these tales convey a common message – love outlasts death, as one or both of the intendeds will and must sacrifice in its name.

This particular episode could be considered the most vivid of the novel, not only because of the evocation of its literary predecessor but also because it is where the deepest disappointments of the novel become fully realized. Davidson is just not a strong enough author to follow through on fluidly projecting his imaginings onto the page. He constantly muddles his sensitivities to his own characters by imparting quick quips and descriptions of the inane (“a plump eggplant’s fecund belly pregnant with stuffing”) that serve to implode the intensity of the moment in favor of a more comforting middle ground. The commitment Davidson requires to own the audacity of his imagination and the characters engrossed within it is just not present on a consistent basis.

And without the consistency, it is taxing to move past the immobility of the present-day story and submerge into the collage of stories-within-stories that is The Gargoyle. While readers can allow themselves to be seduced by the possibility of ever-lasting love that spans centuries, it is markedly more difficult to believe that any of the characters marking the various tales were experiencing love. Little intimacy is portrayed, as Davidson does not excavate any of the emotional depth expected for such a grand topic. There is more sentimental sheen than true affection threaded throughout the novel, and unfortunately that is just not enough.

Davidson’s determination to make The Gargoyle a comprehensive whole is applaudable and a little enviable. He did not back away from the scope of his story, demonstrating an ambitious will for his entrance into the literary world. And he does deserve admiration for his skill at tackling physical descriptions ("I plumped up like a freshly roasted wiener, my skin cracking to accommodate the expanding meat"). Actually, he is perhaps a little too skilled as the first few pages can be more than a little assaulting on the senses.

Guaranteed, The Gargoyle will inspire decidedly different takes on how successful Davidson was on packaging his ambitions within its pages. It will be difficult though for the most ardent supporter to not agree that The Gargoyle suffers from wanting to be more substantial than it regrettably turns out to be.